Continuing my personal ‘Summer Fairs’ project, here is a gallery of 75 new street style photos
Continuing my personal ‘Summer Fairs’ project, here is a gallery of 75 new street style photos
To prove itself – with a heavy duty workhorse truck, such as the 2017 Ford Super Duty – you would expect the message and photo brief to be “The Beast and the Ugly’. Meaning; the ugliest, dirtiest and most macho of industrial environments. But the times, they are a changing!,
Apart from the new super stiff light-alloy construction, at its core, along with the new pampering luxury interior, the exterior is changing too. Most notably the new LED headlamps, a redesigned, powerful front end (with a ton of reflective chrome), described by one observer as ‘almost futuristic’. Seen from this angle the new styling changes are unmistakable. It looks similar to earlier models, from other angles.
Meantime, some are happy to see brand continue to ‘green’ a bit – and be seen to be ‘in harmony’ with ‘something quite pretty’, for a change.
Back in the days of chemical photography this kind of a look occurred when things went wrong (old chemicals. bad paper etc). But the look was intriguing and in rare cases ‘happy accidents’ created highly memorable images.
Nowadays a mindless digital auto-filter is expected to deliver the same effects. Truth is that really successful treatments are as rare as they ever were. No tonal treatment suits every image or is predictable.
Being tasked to deliver a specific high quality graphic/illustration effect ‘on demand’ remains as ‘challenging’ a task as it ever was. This is not least because retaining visual integrity of ‘the product’ is a priority in advertising. Mood, atmosphere and sensual textures come a big second.
Rule 1: Because ‘only God is perfect’, the artist must make deliberate mistakes in their work. This rule has been traditionally associated with hand woven rugs.
This tapestry- like image contains a lot of deliberate imperfections, but ‘the creator’ has nothing to do with that.
Patterns and repetition are effective in attracting the eye, but it soon tires of too much mathematical perfection and symmetry. This idea here was to try to ‘have ones cake and eat it’
The image avoids ‘closure’ and visual boredom because the spaces between the perfectly symmetrical vehicle profiles are variable (and only partly readable). This image needs to be seen large for best effect.
Oh, and Rule1 never made sense to me. Surely, the person who made the rule was impudent and seeking way too much perfection.
The show goes on!
It seems folly not to show up and take more summer fairs photos every year.
143 images http://philipchudy.com/galleries/SanRafaelSummerFair2016/
All of life, it seems takes place on the ’roundabouts’, and everyone of every age and social demographic seems to show up and wear their hearts on their sleeves. As usual I shoot a lot of images in very little time (190 minutes for 143 shown images = avg.45 secs between each shot)
Some of these new images will eventually migrate to the Summer Fairs ‘hall of fame gallery’ on my fine art site.
http://www.philipchudy.com/galleries/RussianRiver2016/#1 Gallery of 15 images.
As usual for this time of year – it was hot summer weather fewer than 10 miles from the beach. But, demonstrating massive bravado with shorts and no head protection, my hands were soon numb and speech slurred from exposure to the cold wind. The Harbor seals were unconcerned – I expect to them it was a sweltering heat wave (see to their sleep -in)
I discovered a small bunch of negatives I never thought I had in my possession. I had seen tiny, faded contact prints but was able to scan and restore the images in high resolution. The negatives had been stored without protective sleeves in non-archival conditions for around 80 years and were in remarkable conditions considering. They come alive now that one can study the details. Some of the negatives were a strange size 4.25″x 3.25″ roll film. Film of this size was unknown through my entire career. In the days before Leica and 35mm this offered plate camera performance without the inconvenience of carrying plates around and as can be seen – it was good for a deal of action and spontaneity.
Only 4 images contain family members of the family and the others in the images are unknown. There is no one alive to ask who was in the images, but I can guess at a few things and a bit of detective work narrowed down the time/location of others.
The river shots are likely to be the Kafue River in Zambia. The shot of my father was dated a placed in London in May 1935 by a colleague who deduced that the stands, which are plain in the shot but are not ordinarily present, were for George V’s Silver Jubilee in May of that year, at which his father was also present. The shot of the Anson was apparently made in Southern Rhodesia on a visit. The steps contain the letters S and R which would have been ‘Southern Rhodesia’.
My sister collated a document written by my mother which documents her flight to Africa from Germany. It should be edited, but is probably suitable for publication. It could be made available for anyone who is keen to read it.
I have been posting galleries the last few years of individual events’ imagery, but never made a ‘master edit’. Now, that is done and I am enjoying the overview of a fairly mature collection. The update to the projects gallery on my fine art site is 2K px resolution, which looks great on a large high resolution monitor. There is a slide show button as well as a full screen on the top – if that helps.
http://www.philipchudyfineart.com/projects/proj1/ (250 images)
The brief was to extend the normal/traditional wine brand vocabulary both in terms of image content as well as color palette. The details may not be apparent on the above – enjoy a larger version here.
The product image above is also exclusively a CGI rendering. Hopefully it impresses with a degree of style and atmosphere one expects from the best photographic studio capture. For a technical observer, it is impressive enough to achieved a a base ‘photographic look’ with CGI, although the viewing public cares only how good an image looks – not at all how it was produced.
Whereas, making technically perfect wine bottle photos is far from the straightforward process many expect it to be, creating the same thing with CGI has it’s challenges too.
With photography, apart from having to compensate for physical imperfections on real production wine bottles, it is often necessary to expose wine product images multiple times, with lighting suited to different parts of the bottle – and then to laboriously combine them later in Photoshop. For example – lighting which makes the label look good will be terrible for the bottle.
With CGI on the other hand – the tendency is to construct too perfect a wire frame model and to texture it such that the final image lacks many of the subtle cues which give it a tactile presence. One needs to work with the right level of imperfection to make the object feel real.
CGI may be coaxed to produce many of the lighting and textural subtleties which one finds in real life but mostly it is at the cost of massive computation. Simply turning up every possible quality option in the software is not an option because the image would never complete. Extensive experimentation was needed to find which quality parameters actually make a difference and which don’t.
CGI permits one to cheat in some ways which are physically impossible with real life photography. While this is an advantage it also requires extensive testing to find out what ‘cheats’ actually are effective in producing a better image.
Although in pre-digital times I shot most of my personal urban and landscape work on 8×10 film and had my own E6 processor, I never took color seriously.
Well, it was easy to take that approach, because in the fine art photography world, prior to the advent of pigment inkjet technology, regular color photo prints themselves were not thought of as legitimate Art objects.
C prints would fade in no time and therefore were not really collectibles and Cibachrome which was fairly light fast was way too contrasty for many transparencies.
Black and white was my main focus. But I usually loaded 2 to 4 sheets of color film into dark slides when I went out. Once in a while I exposed a color frame as a kind of an afterthought when shooting B/W.
This gallery contains a mixed bag of 25 large format color images. http://philipchudy.com/galleries/europe_uk_colorsscans/#1
Most of the images have been scanned in monochrome and can be found on my fine art website www.philipchudyfineart.com.
Here are some small sample images:
A recent spate of scanning old film images produced most of the pics in this small mixed collection from my student days in ‘Brum’.
http://www.philipchudy.com/galleries/Birmingham70s/#1 (26 pictures)
Balsall Heath was being being demolished as part of slum clearance which is why it was cheap for students to live there.
I cannot pretend it was a happy period of my life. After the bright light of Africa to the slums of Birmingham – I may as well have been sent to a gulag. Wikepedia says: ‘By the 1970s the area was notorious for street robberies and drug dealing’.
I was never robbed or troubled but it was certainly the weirdest of places. Although I did not identify with it, nor felt it was my brief to document the period, at least I went out with a camera on a few occasions and made these few pics.
I got an email from Artsy who were researching BIll Brandt when they came across references I had made to his work as a source of inspiration early in my career. This is their Bill Brandt page on him, by the way, and this is where I referred to him: Canis Lupus Familiaris.
Bill sparked an interest in me for strange perspectives and massive depth of field and that interest has been rekindled in recent times digital focust stacking techniques. Whereas this finally permits photographers to exceed the physical optical limits and produce crystal clear images with massive depth, I have not used it in a ‘landscape’ context in recent times.
Stacked images dont suffer diffraction blurring and artifacts which are unavoidable when using small apertures for depth of field. Bill Brandt’s famous nudes were shot with large format lens-less pinhole cameras. The degradation of the images due to diffraction is not at all upsetting in his work – in fact it enhances his chosen subject matter.
I never made or shot images with a pinhole camera. Instead I took apart a wide angle lens for 35 mm and had some disks made with tiny apertures (0.6mm) which I dropped into the lens substituting the existing aperture. The lens focal length defined the angle of view in this case but the pinhole defined the depth of field. Naturally very little light reached the film so exposures were very long and direct sunlight was required. And diffraction limited the crispness of the images. I played around with this for a while and did not persist.
I include two very early images I made using the technique describe above.
With miniature fast sensors and lenses as found in cell phones, these extreme perspectives are easily achieved these days and they don’t shock as much as the perspectives in Bill Brandt’s work did in his day.
Boasting a price tag of $1 million/2000 horsepower/8 speeds/270 miles per hour/ 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, US hypercar maker Trion wants the Nemisis to leave everyone in the dust.
The only time you will see a front view of this ‘rocket on wheels’ will be a for a fleeting moment via you rear view mirror. Chances are you will be be transfixed, which won’t help your driving.
We made this photo so you can cognize the Nemisis’ amazing profile at your leisure without craning your neck, or drifting out of lane.
After a long absence from the US market, Fiat marketing can start from scratch. For the Europeans the 500 brand had to work very hard initially to shake off the ‘pile of junk’ image which the original vehicle undoubtedly deserved. In the USA, Italian flare and ‘Euro fun’ can be the start and end point.
This is a car which looks like a toy and should be enjoyed as a toy. A ‘boy toy toy’, or perhaps a ‘girl toy toy’.The photo is meant to make ambiguous references to street racing as well as to the cute ‘toy’ thing.
http://philipchudy.com/galleries/StillsJan2016/#1 (6 new images)
With this set I set out to test a new equipment I had built. I wanted to reach the same levels of precision and super high resolution I was achieving previously using a view camera rig to stack and stitch. It seemed to work.
Meanwhile – when testing there is no substitute for ‘doing it for real’. And when it comes to focusing on familiar objects I am always captivated stuff I have around which I want to present in new ways. So I went to town with the subject matter also.
When the majority of ones work is on screen it is easy to forget how laborious it is to construct mechanical things which are glitch free. The new technique has a few limitations, so it won’t replace the other completely. But the pictures offer evidence of the basic technical success – satisfyingly achieved without multiple ‘redesign’ iterations this time round.
http://philipchudy.com/galleries/HarareStreetPics (46 pictures)
‘Street pictures from prehistory’ or so it feels like. in more ways than one. For a start, the technology: A recently scanned but otherwise forgotten set of 2 rolls of 35mm black and white film.
For those who forget (or only ever shot digital), a roll contained 36 images – – meaning that 72 exposures were made for this collection. Not a bad hit rate really (for spontaneous grab shots), I feature 46 images.
Two events were covered – one some kind of procession with crowds lining the streets (I have no memory what it was) and the other – just an hour or so down town on a normal work day. At the time it would have been considered extravagant to blow a whole roll of film on one event.
Pro’s have always covered themselves by shooting extra but even amateurs don’t count exposures these days. Back in the day, processing labs routinely processed film which contained seasonal images for the first few frames and ended with the following years’s ones at the tail end.
The cost of film and processing influenced the process significantly. These negatives were processed in a timely manner but they were never printed. They languished for 45 years before receiving any attention from me.
I wont go into it now but politics formed a significant backdrop for all these images, shot as they were almost half way into UDI. Interestingly, I shared a few of these with a former school classmate recently. I was not in contact with him at the time. I would have assumed he was out of the country when the pictures were shot (all of us were scattered around the globe by then). Seeing thepicture below for the first time, he said “that is me in my company car”.
Although Renault’s such as that was were ten a penny I thought it an impossibly long shot. The plate is not readable on the web image. But after a bit of promting he remembered the registration number. Sure enough – later when I looked at the high resolution scan, it confirmed that it was the actual vehicle he was driving at the time.
It reminds me of ‘Crash’ the movie where we the audience get to see how close separate lives can get without the parties being aware of it
Ad Age says a lot – Adage article.
It has been a few weeks and I still have few words – -except to say that although Claude had ‘a lot of past’, but he was the kind of a person who would always have had ‘a lot more future’.
Caption: “Go big …and go to town. We did! We riffed on an offbeat seasonal theme and created 5 more images for you to enjoy“.
This is what I am sending out this year. Happy time to you too.
Nice to know: you can you can ignore that blinding blizzard and forget about blocked drains, not matter what remote wilderness you are stranded in. Drano is always there for you when you need it most (and even when you don’t),
Nice too – that we can create your windswept Arctic wasteland right here in the studio. And as added bonus, our snow is pleasantly perfumed (laundry detergent).
Well this time one or two are drifting out my established banal form for the ‘Familiar Objects’. A couple of these have classic still life/food object pretensions, hence the ‘almost’.
In terms of presentation I must say I am getting a little tired of including ‘detail’ images in galleries showing images from this series. And yet a sense of larger than life detail is a main part of the attraction for this work. These images need to be seen as large prints and It seems a shame not to try to communicate a sense of that with limited web imagery. The good news is other promising presentation ides. Check out this link.
Another year another fun gig doing photo-composition and retouching for the exclusive, collectible, ‘no one can buy it’ poster for the HSB festival. Traditionally it has been a gift – a limited edition print run for the participants. This year there were 100 acts and an estimated 750.000 visitors showed up to listen to a bit of music in the park (see a few of my quick snaps of the event).
Claude Shade (Goodby Silverstein Ptnrs) provided most of the brain/brawn for all prior posters, co producing with Olivia Hellman for the last 5 years. My part is never without challenge also, combining as ever at least 30 different images at extreme high resolution/fidelity (a couple of detail shots are provided to give a sense of that).
This year’s theme is Manet’s Le Déjeuner sur l’herbe only the park is Golden Gate Park and the subjects are from the Blue Grass universe.
Here is the finished poster and 2 detail snippets:
This is how it usually goes – I help Claude Shade (GSPSF) and Olivia Hellman with photo-composition and retouching on the poster. And we complete so close to the event there is no ‘gas left in the tank’ for cavorting in the park with all the other revelers, not to say anything about dealing with a typically impossible parking scenario anywhere near Golden Gate Park.
But, this was the year of the bicycle solution, even if it was also the year of tarrying somewhat (arriving at sundown and ending up with something like a mere 35 mins shoot time). That estimate, by the way was photo-metadata based.
Since there was not professional/commercial incentive to shooting the crowd, it would not have mattered a jot had the day ended with no images of value in the bag. It certainly felt unlikely that I had anything good at the time. But to my surprise my, a couple of images worked (I think). Here is a gallery of 26 images.
I shot for perhaps 2 hours starting with cloud patterns and the extraordinary clear light pre-dusk in Novato, finally ending up at Las Gallinas Ponds in San Rafael. This is a gallery of 22 images. http://philipchudy.com/galleries/LasGallinasSunsetSept2015/#1 and a couple of token images.
Hot on the heels of my last Marin batch another 69 images.
Another year. another couple of hours devoted shooting new images for my ongoing Summer Fairs photo project. http://www.philipchudy.com/galleries/MarinCountyFair2015/#1 (55 new images)
The predictable magic of a Marin sunset laced with strong smell of BBQ overlays a timeless tacky fairground theatricality, which has never respected cultural or physical borders.
And somewhere, somehow the guests inject a sufficiency of honesty, innocence and joy. Without these the whole thing would be soulless and crass. But with it, the mood resonates the romance of the sun’s passage over the hills to Pacific.
Yeah yeah – more sunsets! When you get bored go to pics 16 and 17 in this set http://philipchudy.com/galleries/TamalpaisSun&Turkeys/
What can I say – I only wanted to make up for a hard Sunday’s slaving at the keyboard with a quick outing and some wind up the nose, I race up the hill. Intent on frittering away the last minutes of the day at the top of ‘Tam’ I don’t expect much, But I wend my way round one of the last bends there is a veritable roadblock.
‘Strutting turkey’ in the middle of the road. Doing road maintenance, apparently. Sweeping it seems!
Well – not exactly part of a County transport program The racket produced by violently sandpapering an orchestra of wing feather quills on the tarmac is about as attractive to you and me as diamonds on glass, One assumes that it is a turn on for the ladies of the species.
Thank you human technology for enhancing an age old performance. But eventually – sensing no interest from the row of idling vehicles – he moves away.
He may have been fabulous but at least he could ‘let go’. Not the pair of frisky ones I found hanging in the middle of the road a week or so ago. Somewhat akin to meeting elephant who wont let you pass on that remote road in Africa, these two saw my car as their deadly enemy and they ran head on at me , till I had to jam on the brakes and screech to a halt.
Eventually, having decided that pussy footing it was a bad idea I accelerated and passed them only to find them running at at least 25 mph next to the car for at least 50 yards, pecking at the door panels.
…Country ain’t going to the dogs no matter what they say – it’s just those damned turkey town types undermining civilization as we know it.
Just so you know – we are talking bokeh here now – not dogs or even baseball.
Breaking it’s tyranny – – bokeh, that beloved thing of both photographers and CGI artists alike. Of course there is almost always something mysterious in the vague mental impression which ‘out of focus’ presents. And it does truly add a sense of real life experience since we don’t routinely focus on everything we encounter in the visual world.
But you have to admit that including bokeh in everything is rather a cheap way of jazzing up ones images. After all the whole point of presenting a picture for others to look at is the implied statement that ‘this is something special’ and worth looking at’. How often can one suggest that an uncaring visual snippet of the day has special significance. How often can one get away with suggesting that the most important part of the picture is the negative space occupied by “I can;t quite make out what it is – I will have to use my imagination and invent something”
Infinite depth of field is hard to achieve photographically and it does frequently look inelegant not to say present the viewer with the dilemma of deciding which part of the image should be the focus. We rarely look out on daily reality and see extreme depth of field – and when we do it is a construct which involves focusing the eyes close and far in quick succession and combining both views in the mind.
But a large part of photography is to present stuff that is out of the ordinary – and demonstrate ways of seeing which are uncommon. There may be a price to pay for the discomfort of an image with an extreme depth of field but hopefully there can be rewards too. Bill Brandt thought so with his pinhole series.
Anyhow, whatever one says or chooses to think – none of this should detract from the fact that it really is a dog’s world.
This small selection of banal images add to an existing personal project series of hyper detailed stacked pictures, which were created in the last few months. They were all created to be printed large and the overriding idea throughout has been to mess with one’s sense of scale.
The images were not shot to look dramatic or cosmetically perfect, as is the tradition in advertising. The very ordinariness of the backgrounds (and lighting) is crucial to contrasting the larger than life super detailed presentation.
It is not possible to convey the full effect adequately even on a high resolution monitor. I have included ‘detail’ close up images too (such as the image above). This was a calculated strategy which I am aware does have its down sides. With such inclusions, the risk is that the galleries might give a sense that the whole project is no more than a dry technical exercise. Hopefully on the upside, it compensates somewhat for viewing online rather than in a gallery and it sets the imagination free.
Here are blog entries and links to galleries of other work in this series.
Thanking the local population of wintering stilts and snowy egrets (among others) for their co-operation in posing for this set of mixed photos. http://philipchudy.com/galleries/Marin1-2015